|
Home page
Fingers in
Pagan history
Rings
in Christian history
Rings in
Seventh Day Adventist Church
|
Origins of the wedding ring - Fingers in
pagan history - A Lesson from Ancient Rome.
The trend to multiply the use of rings began in ancient
Rome. In fact, the story of the betrothal ring in ancient Rome can
be instructive for us today. Originally, as mentioned earlier, the
betrothal ring was a plain iron ring, but it soon evolved into
elaborate golden rings. The Encyclopedia Britannica states: "The
giving of a ring to mark a betrothal was an old Roman custom. The
ring was probably a mere pledge, pignus, that the contract would be
fulfilled. In Pliny’s time [about 70 A. D.] conservative custom
still required a plain ring of iron, but the gold ring was
introduced in the course of the second century. This use of the
ring, which was thus of purely secular origin, received
ecclesiastical sanction, and formulae of benediction of the ring
exist from the eleventh century."15
Side note: Looking for
diamond engagement rings or ideas on how to propose?
Tertullian (about 160-225), a pagan lawyer who became an influential
church leader, lamented the extravagance in dress and ornaments that
was evident among the Romans in his time. He commended the ancient
Romans for encouraging modesty by condemning the wearing of gold,
except the marital ring: "I see now no difference between the dress
of matrons and prostitutes. In regard to women, indeed, those laws
of your fathers, which used to be such an encouragement to modesty
and sobriety, have fallen into desuetude, when a woman had yet known
no gold upon her save on the finger, which, with the bridal ring,
her husband had sacredly pledged to himself."16
The "laws of your fathers," which restricted the use of gold to the
bridal ring, presumably were laws passed in the early part of the
second century; as we just noted, at the time of Pliny (about A. D.
70) only the wearing of a plain betrothal iron ring was permitted.
In other words, what began in the first century as a plain iron
betrothal ring to express conjugal commitment, developed by the end
of the second century into elaborate gold rings to display wealth,
pride, and vanity. We shall see that the same thing happened in the
Christian church.
James McCarthy noted the reason for this development: "The trouble
with the Romans, as with others enamored of anything, was that they
began to overdo the wearing of rings. They covered their fingers
with them. Some even wore different rings for summer and winter.
They were immoderate not only in the number of rings worn but also
in their size. Even on the little finger extremely heavy rings of
gold were worn during the twilight days of the Empire. Thumb rings
of even more gigantic size were sported. It would seem as though the
flash of rings paralleled the inevitable fall of the Roman
Empire."17
McCarthy continues noting that in spite of the moralists’
denunciations of their own countrymen for wearing too many rings,
"rings continued to be worn and Rome continued to decline. Rome fell
and the rings continued on. Whether there is a moral here I cannot
say."18 Indeed there is a moral, because what happened in the
history of imperial Rome, has been largely repeated in the history
of Christianity.
|